Adem Energy

How Much Energy Does a Solar Tracker Use?

Energy Consumption of Solar Trackers Explained

One of the most common questions surrounding solar trackers is how much energy do they consume to function? While the main purpose of a solar tracker is to increase the energy production of a solar power system by adjusting the angle of solar panels to optimize sunlight capture, it’s important to consider the energy it takes to operate the tracker itself.

Solar trackers use motors, sensors, and controllers to move the panels throughout the day. The energy used by these components is the additional energy consumption we’re discussing in this section.

Let’s break down how much energy a typical solar tracker consumes:

• Motors and Actuators: These are the primary energy consumers within the tracker system. The motors move the panels along the tracking axis (east-west for single-axis or both axes for dual-axis). Typically, a single-axis tracker uses between 5-10 watts per panel to operate the motors, whereas a dual-axis tracker may use 15-30 watts per panel due to its more complex movement mechanisms.
• Controller and Sensors: These components are responsible for tracking the sun’s position and controlling the motors. They use relatively low amounts of energy, typically around 1-5 watts per tracker. However, in larger systems, or those that use more advanced algorithms for sun tracking, energy use can be slightly higher.
• Energy Use Over Time: The energy consumption of solar trackers is not constant. The panels only need to adjust a few times per day, which means the motors aren’t constantly running. On average, a solar tracker might consume about 0.1 to 1 kWh per day depending on the tracker type, system size, and environmental factors.

Factors That Affect Solar Tracker Energy Consumption

Several variables influence how much energy a solar tracker consumes. These factors can cause fluctuations in the amount of energy used by the tracker system.

1. Tracker Type (Single-Axis vs. Dual-Axis)
   • Single-axis trackers typically consume less energy than dual-axis trackers because they only adjust along one axis. A dual-axis tracker requires more precise and frequent adjustments, using additional power to move both horizontally and vertically.
2. Panel Size and Weight
   • Larger solar panels require more energy to move. If you have heavy, large panels mounted on the tracker, it may take more power for the motor to move them.
3. Location and Environment
   • In areas with strong winds, snow, or extreme temperatures, the tracker motors might use more energy to overcome resistance. For instance, if the wind is strong enough, trackers may need to adjust more frequently or even hold panels in a specific position, consuming additional energy.
4. Frequency of Movement
   • The more frequently a tracker has to adjust, the more energy it will consume. For example, dual-axis trackers may adjust throughout the day as the sun moves, while single-axis trackers typically only adjust once or twice a day.
5. Tracking Precision
   • Trackers with higher precision and advanced algorithms might adjust more frequently and more accurately, potentially using more energy. Some advanced systems use predictive algorithms to track the sun’s path, which can lead to slightly higher energy consumption.

---

How Much Energy Does a Solar Tracker Use in Comparison to Energy Production?

Although solar trackers do consume energy, it’s important to evaluate the energy balance between what they consume and what they produce. The goal of using solar trackers is to increase energy production, so let’s compare the energy consumption of trackers to the energy they help generate.

1. Energy Produced vs. Energy Consumed
   On average, a solar tracker can increase the energy output of a solar system by 25-40% compared to fixed panels. This means that for every 1 kWh of energy consumed by the tracker, you can expect to generate an additional 3 to 4 kWh of solar energy, depending on your location and system setup.
   • Example: If a solar tracker uses 1 kWh of energy per day to adjust the panels, it could generate 4 kWh of additional energy, making the energy consumption negligible when compared to the energy gain.
2. Energy Efficiency Over Time
   When you consider the energy return on investment (EROI), solar trackers are a highly efficient technology. The initial energy consumption of the tracker may seem like a trade-off, but over the long term, the additional energy production (which can last for 20+ years) makes the tracker a very efficient system. Over the lifespan of the system, the energy consumed by the tracker is far outweighed by the energy it helps produce.

---

How Much Energy Does a Solar Tracker Use Annually?

To understand the annual energy consumption of solar trackers, let’s do some quick math:

• Average daily energy use per tracker: 0.1 to 1 kWh/day
• Annual energy use:
  • If a tracker uses 0.1 kWh/day, it will consume 36.5 kWh per year.
  • If a tracker uses 1 kWh/day, it will consume 365 kWh per year.

Comparison to Energy Production

Considering a solar panel generates around 250-400 watts of power per panel, and trackers can increase energy production by 25-40%, the annual energy production increase might look like this:

Type of Tracker	Energy Production Increase	Annual Energy Consumption	Net Energy Gain
Single-Axis Tracker	+25%	36.5 kWh/year	+ 500-600 kWh/year
Dual-Axis Tracker	+40%	365 kWh/year	+ 800-1,200 kWh/year

As seen in the table above, even with energy consumption factored in, solar trackers still provide a significant increase in annual energy production. This shows how efficient and worthwhile solar trackers can be in maximizing the energy output of a solar system.

What Affects the Energy Use of Solar Trackers?

Factors That Influence the Energy Consumption of Solar Trackers

Solar trackers are designed to increase the efficiency and energy output of a solar power system, but their energy consumption can vary based on several factors. To fully understand how much energy a solar tracker uses, it’s important to consider what influences this energy use.

---

1. Type of Tracker: Single-Axis vs. Dual-Axis

The type of solar tracker you choose plays a significant role in how much energy the system will consume. There are two main types of solar trackers: single-axis and dual-axis. Each has a different energy use profile.

Single-Axis Trackers

• Movement: Single-axis trackers move along one axis (east to west), tracking the sun’s daily movement from sunrise to sunset. This movement requires less energy compared to dual-axis trackers.
• Energy Consumption: Because single-axis trackers only move horizontally, they consume less energy, typically around 5-10 watts per panel.
• Energy Output: Single-axis trackers can increase energy production by up to 25% compared to fixed solar panels.

Dual-Axis Trackers

• Movement: Dual-axis trackers follow the sun’s movement both horizontally (east to west) and vertically (up and down), providing more precise tracking throughout the day and year.
• Energy Consumption: Dual-axis trackers consume more energy due to their complexity, with energy use typically ranging between 15-30 watts per panel.
• Energy Output: Dual-axis trackers can increase energy production by up to 40% compared to fixed panels.

Key Point: While dual-axis trackers provide more energy production benefits, they also use more energy to move. However, the additional energy output typically justifies the higher energy consumption, especially for larger installations where maximizing energy capture is a priority.

---

2. Size of Solar Panels

The size and weight of the solar panels mounted on a tracker will influence the energy consumption of the system. Larger and heavier panels are more difficult to move, requiring more energy to adjust.

Larger Panels

• Energy Use: Larger solar panels (e.g., 400W or 500W panels) will require more power to move, as they create more resistance during movement.
• Energy Output: While larger panels generate more energy, they also increase the load on the tracker motors, which can lead to higher energy consumption.

Smaller Panels

• Energy Use: Smaller, lighter panels (e.g., 250W panels) are easier to adjust and require less energy from the tracker motors.
• Energy Output: Although smaller panels might produce less energy individually, when combined with a tracker, they can still yield a significant energy gain.

Key Point: If you’re looking to minimize the energy consumption of your tracker, opting for lighter panels may help reduce the load on the tracker system, thus reducing energy use.

---

3. Environmental Factors: Weather and Location

The environment in which the solar tracker is located has a significant impact on its energy consumption. Local weather conditions, geographic location, and seasonal variations all play a role in how much energy a solar tracker will use to maintain optimal panel positioning.

Temperature

• Cold Climates: In colder climates, trackers may consume slightly more energy to overcome resistance from snow or ice on the panels. However, in many cases, the panels will generate less energy in winter months, and the tracker will not need to adjust as frequently.
• Hot Climates: In hot climates, solar trackers may consume more energy to adjust the panels, as extreme heat can cause additional strain on the motors. However, these regions typically have more sunlight year-round, which can offset the tracker’s energy consumption.

Wind Conditions

• High Winds: In windy areas, solar trackers may need to adjust more frequently to reduce strain on the panels and ensure they are positioned safely. This can increase the energy consumption of the tracker.
• Wind Protection: Some advanced trackers are designed with wind sensors to automatically adjust the panels’ positions during high winds to minimize damage, but these additional adjustments require more power.

Geographic Location

• The latitude of your location influences the angle at which the sun rises and sets throughout the year. Trackers in locations closer to the equator might require fewer adjustments due to the sun’s more consistent path across the sky, leading to lower energy consumption.
• In contrast, higher latitudes with more seasonal variation in the sun’s path might require more frequent adjustments, especially in winter, when the sun is lower in the sky for longer periods.

Key Point: Locations with extreme weather conditions, such as high winds or frequent snow, may increase the energy consumption of solar trackers. Understanding local climate patterns can help in selecting a tracker type and configuration that minimizes energy waste.

---

4. Frequency and Precision of Tracker Movement

The frequency of movement and the precision with which a tracker adjusts to the sun’s position are significant factors in its energy consumption.

Movement Frequency

• Single-Axis Trackers: These typically move once or twice a day to follow the sun’s path. Since the movement is limited, energy consumption is relatively low. However, if the sun’s position changes rapidly (in cases of cloud cover or fast-moving weather systems), the tracker may adjust more often, which can increase energy consumption.
• Dual-Axis Trackers: These trackers adjust more frequently, sometimes multiple times throughout the day, to account for both the sun’s daily movement and its seasonal variation. These frequent adjustments require more energy, especially in systems with high precision tracking.

Precision Tracking

• Advanced Trackers: Some modern trackers use AI or advanced algorithms to predict the sun’s movement and make adjustments proactively, allowing them to maintain higher precision in tracking. While this leads to better energy production, it may result in higher energy consumption to maintain constant adjustments.

Key Point: Trackers that adjust more frequently or with higher precision will use more energy. If energy consumption is a concern, it’s important to balance the benefits of precise tracking with the energy demands of the system.

---

5. Energy Losses and Efficiency of the Tracker System

The efficiency of the tracking system itself—particularly its motors, sensors, and controllers—also impacts the amount of energy the tracker consumes. Modern solar trackers are designed with energy efficiency in mind, but there are still some energy losses due to friction, electrical resistance, and mechanical inefficiencies.

Motor and Controller Efficiency

• High-quality motors and controllers are typically more energy-efficient and require less power to perform the same task. As a result, newer and more advanced systems tend to consume less energy than older models.
• Energy-efficient sensors and low-power controllers can also reduce the overall energy use of a tracker system.

Key Point: Choosing a high-efficiency tracker can help minimize the energy use while maintaining optimal performance. Over time, advances in technology are likely to make solar trackers even more energy-efficient.

Is the Energy Consumption of Solar Trackers Worth the Investment?

Weighing the Energy Consumption vs. Energy Production of Solar Trackers

When deciding whether to install a solar tracker, one of the most critical considerations is whether the additional energy consumption of the tracker is justified by the boost in energy production it provides. As we’ve established in previous sections, solar trackers use energy to adjust solar panels, but they also improve energy efficiency by positioning the panels optimally throughout the day.

The question becomes: Is the additional energy consumed by the tracker offset by the increased solar energy production? We’ll explore this in-depth, including the long-term financial benefits, the return on investment (ROI), and how tracking systems contribute to overall energy savings.

---

1. Increased Energy Output: The Primary Benefit of Solar Trackers

The most significant advantage of solar trackers is their ability to increase energy production by positioning solar panels at the optimal angle throughout the day. Depending on the type of tracker and environmental conditions, solar trackers can increase energy output by:

• Single-axis trackers: Typically 25% more energy compared to fixed systems.
• Dual-axis trackers: Can boost output by up to 40% compared to fixed systems.

Energy Production Example:

Let’s break this down with an example:

• Fixed Solar Panel System: A fixed solar panel system generates 5 kWh/day on average in an ideal location.
• Single-Axis Tracker System: With a 25% increase in energy output, the tracker system generates 6.25 kWh/day (a boost of 1.25 kWh per day).
• Dual-Axis Tracker System: A 40% increase would lead to 7 kWh/day (an additional 2 kWh per day).

Even though a tracker uses some energy to adjust the panels, the extra energy produced typically outweighs the amount of energy consumed.

---

2. ROI (Return on Investment) for Solar Trackers

When evaluating whether the energy consumed by solar trackers is worth the investment, it’s essential to calculate the return on investment (ROI). Solar trackers have higher upfront costs than fixed panels due to the additional hardware and technology involved. However, the higher energy production leads to faster payback periods and better long-term financial returns.

Calculating the ROI:

Let’s calculate the ROI for a solar tracker system in a real-world example.

• Fixed Solar Panels: A standard 5 kW fixed system may cost around $10,000 to install (before incentives).
• Solar Tracker System: A comparable tracker system might cost $15,000 due to the added technology and complexity.

Let’s assume:

• Energy Output:
  • Fixed system generates 5 kWh/day, or 1,825 kWh/year.
  • Tracker system (single-axis) generates 6.25 kWh/day, or 2,281 kWh/year.
• Electricity Rate: Assume the local electricity rate is $0.12/kWh.

Annual Energy Production Value:

• Fixed System: 1,825 kWh/year × $0.12/kWh = $219/year.
• Tracker System: 2,281 kWh/year × $0.12/kWh = $273/year.

The tracker system generates an additional $54/year in energy savings.

Break-Even Analysis:

• The additional cost of the tracker system is $5,000.
• Annual Savings: $273 (tracker) – $219 (fixed) = $54/year more savings.

To calculate the payback period:

• Payback Period = $5,000 (additional cost) ÷ $54/year = 92.6 years.

This simple calculation shows that in this example, the energy gain from a solar tracker is modest, making the payback period quite long.

However, keep in mind that this doesn’t factor in:

1. Tax incentives or rebates for installing solar systems, which can reduce initial costs.
2. Inflation of electricity prices, which often increase over time. This means that over the long term, the savings from a tracker system might increase significantly as electricity rates rise.
3. Increased panel lifespan and performance due to better sun exposure.

---

3. Long-Term Benefits and Sustainability

In the long run, solar trackers offer a more significant return on investment when considering the lifetime energy production. Most solar trackers last 20-25 years, and during this period, their ability to maximize energy production can lead to substantial savings and benefits, even if their energy consumption adds some cost.

Sustainability of Solar Trackers:

• Solar trackers can improve the efficiency of solar systems in low-light conditions, such as cloudy or winter days, when fixed panels might underperform.
• As the energy production of trackers increases over time, especially in areas with high seasonal variation, the long-term environmental benefits outweigh the initial energy use.

Key Point: While the upfront cost and initial energy consumption may seem like a drawback, the long-term benefits of increased energy production make solar trackers a worthwhile investment for maximizing the sustainability of solar energy systems.

---

4. The Role of Solar Trackers in Large-Scale Projects

For commercial and industrial solar installations, where space is often a limitation and energy demand is high, solar trackers can drastically increase energy output. Large-scale solar farms using dual-axis trackers can see significant improvements in energy generation, leading to higher profits over time.

Case Study: Large Solar Farms with Trackers

• A 10 MW solar farm with fixed panels might produce 18,250,000 kWh/year.
• The same farm using single-axis trackers could increase energy output by 25%, producing 22,812,500 kWh/year.
• With a $0.12/kWh electricity rate, the additional energy produced equals $540,750/year.

In large projects, even a modest increase in energy production can have a significant financial impact, making the additional energy consumption of trackers a minor consideration when compared to the larger revenue generation.

---

5. The Bottom Line: Is the Energy Consumption Worth the Investment?

When evaluating whether solar trackers are worth the additional energy they consume, it’s clear that in most cases, the energy produced by trackers more than compensates for the energy consumed. For residential installations, the upfront cost of trackers can make the payback period longer, but for commercial and industrial projects, the financial benefits are more pronounced.

• Residential systems: Solar trackers can be a good investment if maximizing energy output is a priority, but they come with higher upfront costs and longer payback periods.
• Commercial/Utility-scale systems: The higher energy production, especially in large installations, makes trackers highly profitable and efficient, with quicker payback periods and greater returns.

---

We’ve explored how the energy consumption of solar trackers compares to the energy production benefits. While the additional energy used by trackers is a consideration, the overall ROI, sustainability benefits, and long-term energy savings typically make them a worthwhile investment, especially in large-scale installations.

We’ve seen that solar trackers provide higher energy production, lower overall electricity costs, and environmental benefits, making their higher energy consumption a minor factor in most cases.